In 2008 at the height of the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis, two prominent Federal housing finance agencies established as Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) were placed in conservatorship by an act of Congress. The Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) were placed under the authority and control of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which was created by the Federal Housing Finance Regulatory Reform Act of 2008. At the time, U.S. Treasury Secretary Paulson strongly endorsed the move, stating that conservatorship was the only form in which I would commit taxpayer money to the GSEs. I attribute the need for today’s action primarily to the inherent conflict and flawed business model embedded in the GSE structure, and to the ongoing housing correction.” While it is generally acknowledged that both agencies were mismanaged and in need of close supervision, some critics claim the oversight move was the first step in shutting down these unwieldy bureaucracies. Investors in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac allege just such an intention.
Two Lawsuits in Two Days
A New York-based firm described as an activist hedge fund management company filed suit against the U.S. government last week claiming that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac regulators syphoned off profits from the two agencies thereby depriving holders of their common stock of rightful profits. The complaint alleges that since 2012 FHFA has diverted such profits into the U.S. Treasury at the expense of investors. The action has been characterized as a confiscation, and the amount claimed is estimated to reach $130 billion by next month. Although both suits are similarattacking the terms of the government bailout mechanismthe latest suit seeks injunctive relief against net worth sweeps and a declaratory judgment that the modified bailout terms and accompanying sweeps are illegal. According to the complaint, The net worth sweeps make plaintiffsand all of the other common shareholders’shareholders’ in name only.”
Constitutional Claim
The plaintiffs allege that the FHFA actions violate the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution: i.e., the taking of private property for public use without just compensation. The Court of Federal Claims asserts that the intention of the conservators is to to strip profits from the companies. Accordingly, it seeks damages, disgorgement, and restitution for the investors.
Other Hedge Funds File Separate Suits
About 20 other hedge funds and investors have previously filed lawsuits over the governments channeling of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac profits away from investors; however, those actions are based on the claims of preferred stockholderswhose dividends were eliminated in 2012as opposed to the interests of common shareholders.
Read More:
best hedge fund managers of all time
best performing hedge funds 10 years
top 10 biggest hedge funds us 2024
biggest hedge funds in san francisco
what is not a benefit of having a good credit score?
Peyman Khosravani is a global blockchain and digital transformation expert with a passion for marketing, futuristic ideas, analytics insights, startup businesses, and effective communications. He has extensive experience in blockchain and DeFi projects and is committed to using technology to bring justice and fairness to society and promote freedom. Peyman has worked with international organizations to improve digital transformation strategies and data-gathering strategies that help identify customer touchpoints and sources of data that tell the story of what is happening. With his expertise in blockchain, digital transformation, marketing, analytics insights, startup businesses, and effective communications, Peyman is dedicated to helping businesses succeed in the digital age. He believes that technology can be used as a tool for positive change in the world.
